With the current hoo-hah over Brighton and Hove District Council’s decision to award school places to children by pulling their names out of a hat, I’ve decided now’s the perfect time to wade my deeply ill-informed carcass into the debate. We all want our kids to get a good education (even the stupid ones who are destined from birth to stack shelves or steal for a living no matter how much geography you throw at ‘em), but that’s simply not possible for all of them because a lot of the UK’s schools are shit. So how do we allocate the few precious places we have? Which kids get them? In an ideal world there would be some sort of machine that would gauge whether your child will grow up to discover the cure for cancer or spend twenty years watching chat shows on Channel Five semi-comatose on drugs and Baker’s Oven sausage rolls. Sadly, no such machine exists, so here are some suggestions to decide which kids get to grow up to be rich and successful and which ones get to become tuberculosis-ridden scum ….
1. Sport
Remember the policy schools used to have in the olden days? The best pupils were seen as the ones who were good at sport. These big, strapping lads were preened for greatness by their schools, set up as the blueprint for what made a good child, and many went on to become highly successful middle-managers, probation officers, and insurance underwriters. So why not use the policy of discrimination schools used to use during P.E. to choose who gets to go to the good school and who gets to go to the one where the kids are no better than apes? So, all kids preparing to go to school in September are gathered together in a room that smells of sweat and dirty genitals. A paedophile in a tracksuit then picks the two biggest children who both take turns to pick children in a descending order of sportiness. The top 40% of these muscle-bound, dimwitted lugs could then be shipped off to the best schools, whereas the remaining 60% of fat, skinny and ’sensitive’ children who are last to be picked could be condemned to a sub-standard education. Play up and play the game!
2. Jousting
Why not make kids joust for a place? This solution offers children a level of competitiveness sadly lacking in today’s caring culture, and also offers adults something fun and vaguely medieval to watch at the weekends. Tournaments could be organised throughout the land with children battling it out on horseback for the right to a good education. This would be of particular advantage to fat children because their weight would anchor them to the saddle. Children with good hand/eye coordination would also thrive. Best of all, as jousting is an extremely dangerous sport, many children would not survive the tournaments thus freeing up precious places for those children prepared to pull their little fingers out and unseat all challengers. I’faith!
3. Survival of the Fittest
Why not let kids loose in the woods and hunt them with dogs and guns? It would soon become obvious which children deserved the quality placements because these would be the ones left alive at the end of the hunt. Best of all, this option would create an even playing-field for all children (except for girls) as the ones displaying the most cunning and forward-planning skills would survive regardless of their abilities in other areas – all except fat children who would be gunned down within minutes no matter how smart they were. Also, this option solves the current issue of what to do with all those redundant fox-hunts we currently have knocking about at the moment. Tally Ho!
4. Work
The Chinese have the right idea. None of this ’sat in your bedroom playing Grand Theft Auto‘ malarky for Chinese children, oh no. From the moment the little bastards can walk they’re put to work in factories making toys and cheap clothing for spoilt Western children who don’t know they’re born. So why not make our children work like their Chinese counterparts? Foremen could keep an eye on them and those that work like dogs (say, making 2000 pairs of underpants per day or picking an entire field of potatoes in an afternoon) could earn the right to a good education. Slovenly children would carry on working in factories until they die, thus boosting Britain’s economy, whereas children not afraid to get their hands dirty would end up in schools learning the skills they need to become the next generation of factory over-seers. Best of all, we wouldn’t have to pay these children for their time – their wage would be the reward of a precious school placement. Get back to work!
5. The Aryan Solution
Why not classify children along racial lines? Those with blond hair, blue eyes and light skin could be sent to the best our education system has to offer. Those with hump-backs, brown (or ‘dirty’) hair, strange facial ticks, mental disablilities, a bad attitude or a lack of commitment to the state and its Four Year Plan could be rounded up, used as forced-labour to build swimming pools and municipal opera houses, then gassed. Zeig Heil!
6. Trial by Fire
Is it too strong to suggest we simply set fire to children in a big pit and let ‘em fight one another for posession of the sole bucket of water provided? Hot stuff!